The Distance Is the Job

Almost every engagement starts the same way. Someone calls, and they hand me the problem in the careful, pre-washed language companies use before they completely trust you. A communication issue on the leadership team. A documentation gap. A second set of eyes on an AI vendor they already signed.

None of those is the real problem, and most of the time I can feel the real one underneath before the first call is over. The communication issue is a senior leader everyone's quietly learned to route around. The documentation gap is two years of managers doing whatever was easiest. The untested and unaudited AI vendor is a looming discrimination claim.

After more than a decade of this, I’ve realized the problem isn't that the organization is blind. It’s paralyzed. The issues are well-known, documented by collective silence, and have been for months or years. The problem is the structural pressure that prevents anyone inside from acknowledging what everyone can see.

Last time I wrote here, I argued that the silo of solo work isn't a mindset problem but a structural one, and that the isolation is the price of operating without the floor a real employer gives you. That piece was about what the silo takes. This one is about the part I didn't understand until much later, that the exact distance that makes the work lonely is the thing my clients are paying for.

‍

The Upside of Never Belonging

Spend your whole career inside one company and you get deep on that one company. You learn its history, its founders' moods, the way it shapes its own story. That's real expertise, and it's not available to me.

What I get instead is range. I drop into a new place, and then another, and after enough of them you stop seeing thirty unrelated problems and start seeing the same handful on repeat. 

The startup that swears its turnover is about "a high bar for excellence," when the actual problem is a founder who humiliates people in the all-hands. The company that "treats its contractors like family," a phrase that is going to read very differently to the Department of Labor. 

Each one is living its problem as something singular, because from the inside it is. I'm the one who's seen it in countless other companies.

And because I came up through law before I came up through HR, the pattern usually arrives with a price tag attached. The misclassified contractors aren't a culture quirk; they're back wages, penalties, and a filing somebody is eventually going to make. The handshake comp structure isn't generous; it's a pay equity claim. The distance lets me see the shape and scope of the problem. The training lets me tell you what it's going to cost.

That's the trade. I'll never know any single client the way their own people do. But I can see across all of them in a way no insider ever can.

‍

The Thing Only an Outsider Can Say

Here's what took me years to understand. The range matters, but it isn't the rarest thing I bring. The rarest thing is that I can say it out loud.

Almost none of what I find is a secret. The people inside know. They'll tell you, one at a time, in their own way. 

What they won't do is say it with their name attached, because the person who built the broken thing is on the call, or the person who'd have to own the fix signs their reviews, or they watched the last one who raised a hand get replaced. So it sits there for months, costing the place money and people and patience, and everybody just works around it.

I'm the one who finally says what needs to be said because I have less to lose. Nobody inside the org signs my reviews, determines if I get a promotion, or decides if I get a raise.

But I didn’t always have less to lose. I spent years on the inside in different capacities, biting my tongue with the best of them, sitting in meetings where I knew exactly what was wrong and said a careful, reasonable-sounding version of absolutely nothing. I was just closer then, and being close can keep you quiet. 

The distance that means I'll never belong is the same distance that lets me put the uncomfortable sentence in the open. Sometimes I hand the person inside the words and the cover to say it themselves, and I let them have the win. Either way, it finally gets said. And it gets said because I'm standing outside, where saying it is free.

‍

What I Wish Someone Had Told Me

The reason any of this matters to you, if you're operating solo, is that the loneliness and the value come from the same place. Most of us spend years treating that loneliness as a problem to fix without realizing the fix would take the value down with it. A few things I wish I'd understood sooner.

Know what you're actually selling. The contract says "audit" or "fractional support" or "a second set of eyes." That is not the job. The job is the judgment to find the real problem fast and the standing to name it, and that is worth a great deal more than the hours it takes. 

When you price and pitch yourself as a pair of capable hands, you teach clients to buy you that way. You are not renting out time. You are renting out the one thing their own org chart can't produce: blunt transparency speaking truth to power.

Guard the distance like the asset it is. The hardest pull in solo work is the pull to belong. You're on the outside looking in, the team is warm, and it feels good when they start treating you like one of them. But the day you need these people to like you is the day you stop being able to do the thing they hired you for. 

This isn’t just a professional stance, either. It’s financial discipline. Maintaining this distance is a choice that carries real volatility. You’re trading the security of belonging for the freedom to be honest, and you have to be comfortable with the instability that comes with that exchange. If you aren’t willing to pay that price, you will inevitably end up compromising the clarity the client actually needs. 

This isn’t to say you should be stubborn, abrasive, and coarse. You can be friendly, and you should. You can care about the outcome and the people, and I do, genuinely, that’s why many of us do this work. 

What you can't do is start managing your own standing inside a company that isn't yours. The moment you have something to protect there, you've become another insider who can't say the hard truth.

Treat candor as a craft, not a personality trait. Being willing to say the hard thing is easy. Saying it so it actually lands, so whatever’s broken gets fixed is the real skill, and it takes work. It means knowing when to say it live on the call and when to put it in writing, when to name a person and when to name a pattern, and when the smartest move is to hand the words to the insider who has to live there after I'm gone. 

Blunt is easy. Useful is hard. The clients worth keeping can tell the difference, and so should you.

‍

The Only Way It Works

The view from the outside is a trade-off, not a tragedy. I will never belong to the organizations I help. And because I sat inside for years, I know exactly what that belonging is worth. 

If I’m doing the work right, the best outcome isn’t a permanent seat at the table. It’s making myself unnecessary. I go in, I build the clarity they couldn’t find on their own, and then I leave, including leaving the people I got close to.

That part never stops being lonely. I’ve just stopped treating it as a flaw in the work instead of the price of being good at it. 

‍

Bryan Driscoll is a non-practicing lawyer, fractional CHRO, and HR consultant based in Las Vegas. He's the HR leader your employment lawyer wishes you had, someone who approaches people strategy through the lens of legal risk and compliance without losing sight of what's actually best for the workforce. He serves on the boards of the Freelancers Union and the International Human Rights Art Movement, and his writing has appeared in Forbes, Best Lawyers, The Nevada Independent, Nevada Current, and Lattice. Reach out to hello@troophr.com to continue the conversation with Bryan.

‍